Georgia Court of Appeals, 1913

Hardin v. Stansel

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided June 25, 1913 · Hill

13 Ga. App. 22; 78 S.E. 681; 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 9

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Jones v. Dupree (Ga. Ct. App. 1956)
Arnold v. Jowers (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
Holland v. King (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
Johnson v. Lipscomb-Weyman-Chapman Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1933)
Wilcox v. Wilcox (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
Collier v. Holland (Ga. Ct. App. 1919)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Hill, C. J.

I. Where property placed in the hands of a broker for sale is subsequently sold by the owner, the broker is entitled to his commission, if he was the procuring cause of the sale, although the sale was actually consummated by the owner. Graves v. Hunnicutt, 8 Ga. App. 99 (68 S. E. 558); Doonan v. Ives, 73 Ga. 295.

*23Decided June 25, 1913.

Complaint; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. March 7, 1913.

B. G. Eartsfield, for plaintiff in error. Earrell S Wilson, contra.

2. No error of law is complained of, and the verdict is supported by evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.