Georgia Court of Appeals, 1913

Hall v. Roehr & Co.

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided September 23, 1913 · Russell

13 Ga. App. 472; 79 S.E. 379; 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 216

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Mutual Fertilizer Company v. Deloach (Ga. Ct. App. 1945)
Porter v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Russell, J.

“Where the only questions presented for review by this court arise upon rulings by'the court below on the trial of the issue raised by a special plea to the jurisdiction, which was not sustained by the verdict thereon returned, and it appears that neither a reversal of any one or more of such rulings nor a setting aside of §uch verdict would operate to terminate the main ease, but would leave the same still pending, the writ of error is premature and must be dismissed.” Ross v. Mercer, 115 Ga. 353 (41 S. E. 594). See also, State Mutual Association v. Kemp, 115 Ga. 355 (41 S. E. 652); Warren v. Blevins, 94 Ga. 215 (21 S. E. 459). Writ of error dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.