There was circumstantial evidence which authorized the inference that the plaintiff acquired title to the note subsequently to its maturity, and that for that reason he was not a bona fide purchaser. The charge of the court was a full, fair and able presentation of the law applicable to the case, and, when considered as a whole, was not subject to any of the exceptions presented in the motion for a new trial. For that reason the verdict approved by the trial judge will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.