Georgia Court of Appeals, 1915

Smith v. Brown & Co.

Smith v. Brown & Co.
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 29, 1915 · Broyles
16 Ga. App. 608; 85 S.E. 950; 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 152

Smith v. Brown & Co.

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, J.

1. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury’s finding that credit for the goods included in the account sued on was extended by the plaintiff to the defendant (a married woman) in her individual capacity, and that she was liable for the same. See Connerat v. Goldsmith, 6 Ga. 14; Mitchell v. Treanor, 11 Ga. 324 (3, 4), 326 (56 Am. D. 421); Schofield v. Jones, 85 Ga. 816, 824 (11 S. E. 1032); Goodson v. Powell, 9 Ga. App. 497 (71 S. E. 765); Reynolds v. Starks, ante, 606 (85 S. E. 950).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict. There was no material error of law; and the judgment of the appellate division of the municipal court, refusing a new trial, is Affirmed.

Russell, G. J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.