Spradley v. State
Spradley v. State
17 Ga. App. 327; 86 S.E. 738; 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 386
Spradley v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. Considered in connection with the charge as a whole, the excerpts complained of contain no error sufficient to require the grant of a new trial.
2. While the evidence is altogether circumstantial, it sufficiently supports the verdict of guilty, to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.
3. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed..
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.