Carey v. Wyatt

Georgia Court of Appeals
Carey v. Wyatt, 17 Ga. App. 517 (1916)
87 S.E. 770; 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 742
Broyles

Carey v. Wyatt

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, J.

The judge of the city court did not err in vacating and setting aside that portion of the judgment which included attorney’s fees, it appearing undisputed in the record that the statutory notice of intention to include ten per cent, for attorney’s fees, as required by section 4252 of the Civil Code, failed to state the name of the holder of the note; and, this not being an amendable defect, that portion of the judgment was absolutely void and rendered the judgment open to attack, under section 5957 of the Civil Code. Baskins v. Valdosta Bank, 5 Ga. App. 600 (4), 601 (63 S. E. 648); Edenfield v. Bank of Millen, 7 Ga. App. 645 (3), 648 (67 S. E. 896); Gelders v. Kennedy, 9 Ga. App. 389, 390 (71 S. E. 503 ) The proceeding to set aside the judgment was not too late, as it was brought within three years from the rendition of the same. See Civil Code, § 4358. Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Carey, trustee v. Wyatt
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published