Georgia Court of Appeals, 1916

Hood v. Battle

Hood v. Battle
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided June 28, 1916 · Hodges
18 Ga. App. 319; 89 S.E. 373; 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 332

Hood v. Battle

Opinion of the Court

Hodges, J.

It appearing, from undisputed evidence, tliat the defendant was in possession of sufficient facts to put him on actual notice and inquiry, as a prudent man, as to the nature of the “papers” held by the plaintiff against the property in controversy, the judgment is affirmed. Park’s Ann. Code, § 4530. It is unnecessary to deéide other questions raised by the record. Judgment affirmed,.

Merrill & Grantham, for plaintiff in error. Boscoe Lulce, G. E. Hay, James Humphreys, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.