Hood v. Battle
Hood v. Battle
18 Ga. App. 319; 89 S.E. 373; 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 332
Hood v. Battle
Opinion of the Court
It appearing, from undisputed evidence, tliat the defendant was in possession of sufficient facts to put him on actual notice and inquiry, as a prudent man, as to the nature of the “papers” held by the plaintiff against the property in controversy, the judgment is affirmed. Park’s Ann. Code, § 4530. It is unnecessary to deéide other questions raised by the record. Judgment affirmed,.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.