Byrd & Co. v. Interstate Chemical Co.

Georgia Court of Appeals
Byrd & Co. v. Interstate Chemical Co., 19 Ga. App. 412 (1917)
91 S.E. 578; 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 133
Bloodworth

Byrd & Co. v. Interstate Chemical Co.

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The defendant in execution having failed to make the sheriff of the county a party to the traverse, of the entry of service (Civil Code, § 5566),-and having failed to give the sheriff any notice whatever thereof, the entry of service appearing to haye been made by a deputy sheriff, who was made a party, the illegality proceeding could have had no other legal termination than in favor of the defendant in error. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Davis, 14 Ga. App. 790 (82 S. E. 387); Rawlings v. Brown, 15 Ga. App. 162 (3), 164 (82 S. E. 803); Citizens Bank of Bainbridge v. Fort, 15 Ga. App. 427 (83 S. E. 678) ; Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co. v. Clark, ante, 376. While this fatal defect should properly have been reached by a timely motion to strike the traverse, yet under the facts of the case the court did not err in directing, upon motion, a verdict for the plaintiff in execution and against the affidavit of illegality. .

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenhms, J., concur.Affidavit of illegality; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. June 21, 1915. , .J. D. Lovett, for plaintiff in error.' W. B. Smith, contra.

Reference

Full Case Name
Byrd & Company v. Interstate Chemical Company
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published