Georgia Court of Appeals, 1917

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Amerson

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Amerson
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 20, 1917 · Bloodworth
19 Ga. App. 591; 91 S.E. 999; 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 242

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Amerson

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for new trial not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned.

2. The evidence of the witness Wells was not inadmissible for the reason stated in the motion for a new trial. Where a lengthy extract from the evidence was objected to as a whole and on several grounds, and some of it was admissible, the objection to the whole was properly overruled. Great Southern &c. Co. v. Guthrie, 13 Ga. App. 288, 292 (79 S. E. 162).

3. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.