Georgia Court of Appeals, 1917

Nash v. State

Nash v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 30, 1917 · Broyles
21 Ga. App. 76; 94 S.E. 60; 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 428

Nash v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, P. J.

1. The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the court, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury, to adjudge the defendant guilty. Miller v. State, 9 Ga. App. 827 (72 S. E. 279).

2. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, notwithstanding the judgment overruling the motion was rendered, as disclosed by the bill of exceptions, β€œon Friday the thirteenth.”

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.