Nash v. State
Nash v. State
21 Ga. App. 76; 94 S.E. 60; 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 428
Nash v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the court, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury, to adjudge the defendant guilty. Miller v. State, 9 Ga. App. 827 (72 S. E. 279).
2. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, notwithstanding the judgment overruling the motion was rendered, as disclosed by the bill of exceptions, βon Friday the thirteenth.β
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.