Whidby v. State
Whidby v. State
21 Ga. App. 146; 94 S.E. 61; 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 480
Whidby v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. “A motion for a mistrial was not the appropriate remedy when, upon a x>oll of the jury, the party against whom the verdict was rendered contended that it appeared from the answers of one of the jurors that it was not his verdict.” Macon Railway &c. Co. v. Barnes, 121 Ca. 444 (49 S. E. 282).
2. The court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.