Walker v. O'Neal
Walker v. O'Neal
21 Ga. App. 563; 94 S.E. 835; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 406
Walker v. O'Neal
Opinion of the Court
1. No error was committed in overruling the demurrer to the petition.
2. This suit was not on a quantum meruit, but on an express contract for commissions for a fixed amount, to wit, $250; hence it was error, warranting the grant of a new trial, for the court, over proper and timely objections, to allow evidence that the services of the plaintiffs in procuring a purchaser for the" property were “reasonably worth the sum of $100, and that the usual commission allowed real-estate agents was five per cent.”
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.