McIntyre v. Habersham Bank
McIntyre v. Habersham Bank
22 Ga. App. 21; 95 S.E. 306; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 109
McIntyre v. Habersham Bank
Opinion of the Court
Under the facts and procedure as here presented, it was,not error to vacate the previous judgment of the court and reinstate the case on the docket for trial. Civil Code (1910), § 5958. Ford v. Clark, 129 Ga. 292 (58 S. E. 818); Turner v. Jordan, 67 Ga. 604; East Tenn. Railway Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 35, 37, (22 S. E. 36); Gillespie v. Farkas, 19 Ga. App. 158 (91 S. E. 244).
Judgment affirmed.
cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 6221, 6278, 6280, 5965; Read Phosphate Co. v. Wells, 18 Ga. App. 656-7.
cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4964, 4955, 6278; Hughes v. Coursey, 46 Ga. 116; East Tenn. &c. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 37; McWilliams v. Standard &c. Co., 92 Ga. 438-9.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.