Georgia Court of Appeals, 1918

McIntyre v. Habersham Bank

McIntyre v. Habersham Bank
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 13, 1918 · Jenkins
22 Ga. App. 21; 95 S.E. 306; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 109

McIntyre v. Habersham Bank

Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, J.

Under the facts and procedure as here presented, it was,not error to vacate the previous judgment of the court and reinstate the case on the docket for trial. Civil Code (1910), § 5958. Ford v. Clark, 129 Ga. 292 (58 S. E. 818); Turner v. Jordan, 67 Ga. 604; East Tenn. Railway Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 35, 37, (22 S. E. 36); Gillespie v. Farkas, 19 Ga. App. 158 (91 S. E. 244).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. M. Pitner, George M. DuBose, for plaintiff in error,C. E. Sutton, contra,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4964, 4955, 6278; Hughes v. Coursey, 46 Ga. 116; East Tenn. &c. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 37; McWilliams v. Standard &c. Co., 92 Ga. 438-9.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.