McIntyre v. Habersham Bank

Georgia Court of Appeals March 13, 1918

McIntyre v. Habersham Bank, 22 Ga. App. 21 (1918)

95 S.E. 306; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 109

Jenkins

Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, J.

Under the facts and procedure as here presented, it was,not error to vacate the previous judgment of the court and reinstate the case on the docket for trial. Civil Code (1910), § 5958. Ford v. Clark, 129 Ga. 292 (58 S. E. 818); Turner v. Jordan, 67 Ga. 604; East Tenn. Railway Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 35, 37, (22 S. E. 36); Gillespie v. Farkas, 19 Ga. App. 158 (91 S. E. 244).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. M. Pitner, George M. DuBose, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 6221, 6278, 6280, 5965; Read Phosphate Co. v. Wells, 18 Ga. App. 656-7.

C. E. Sutton, contra,

cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4964, 4955, 6278; Hughes v. Coursey, 46 Ga. 116; East Tenn. &c. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 37; McWilliams v. Standard &c. Co., 92 Ga. 438-9.

Reference

Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published