Georgia Court of Appeals, 1918

Harbin v. Flannigan

Harbin v. Flannigan
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided March 13, 1918 · Bloodwobth
22 Ga. App. 30; 95 S.E. 320; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 119

Harbin v. Flannigan

Opinion of the Court

Bloodwobth, J.

1. Tlie reference in the brief of counsel for the' plaintiff in error to the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial does not amount to an argument, and these grounds will be treated as abandoned. Mills v. State, 19 Ga. App. 623 (1), 624 (91 S. E. 918), and cases cited; Laffitte v. State, 105 Ga. 595 (1), 596 (31 S. E. 540); Moss v. Bohanon, 111 Ga. 871 (36 S. E. 954).

2. There Is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.