Clements v. State
Clements v. State
22 Ga. App. 625; 97 S.E. 81; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 636
Clements v. State
Opinion of the Court
The answer of the trial judge to the petition for certiorari was neither traversed nor excepted to. The evidence, as set forth in the answer, with the legal inferences and deductions arising therefrom, authorized the finding of the trial judge, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.