Georgia Court of Appeals, 1918

Osterholtz v. State

Osterholtz v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 14, 1918 · Bloodwoetii
22 Ga. App. 649; 96 S.E. 1045; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 658

Osterholtz v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bloodwoetii, J.^

The accused was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, and this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based on general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.