Booker v. Heard & Sutton
Booker v. Heard & Sutton
22 Ga. App. 700; 96 S.E. 1048; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 695
Booker v. Heard & Sutton
Opinion of the Court
The testimony admitted over objection was not material and necessary to the plaintiff's cause, and was harmless to the cause of the defendant. The evidence authorized the verdict against the defendant, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.