Georgia Court of Appeals, 1918

Daniel v. Keen

Daniel v. Keen
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 23, 1918 · Bloodworth
23 Ga. App. 105; 97 S.E. 444; 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 66

Daniel v. Keen

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case is not in the record. However, the bill of exceptions, duly certified, recite^ that the motion for a new trial was submitted on the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.