Lane v. Bank of Thomasville
Lane v. Bank of Thomasville
23 Ga. App. 275; 97 S.E. 884; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 83
Lane v. Bank of Thomasville
Opinion of the Court
1. Where, in a suit upon a promissory note, the debtor shows that he paid a part of it to a supposed agent of the holder of the note, but fails to show that the supposed agent produced the note at the time of payment, or that the money so collected ever reached the owner of the note, or that the alleged' agent had specific authority to collect trie note, no valid defense of partial payment is shown. Dibble v. Law, 141 Ga. 364 (80 S. E. 999), and cases there cited; Civil Code (1910), § 3578.
2. For none of the reasons assigned did the court err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.