Georgia Court of Appeals, 1919

Lane v. Bank of Thomasville

Lane v. Bank of Thomasville
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided January 15, 1919 · Luke
23 Ga. App. 275; 97 S.E. 884; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 83

Lane v. Bank of Thomasville

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

1. Where, in a suit upon a promissory note, the debtor shows that he paid a part of it to a supposed agent of the holder of the note, but fails to show that the supposed agent produced the note at the time of payment, or that the money so collected ever reached the owner of the note, or that the alleged' agent had specific authority to collect trie note, no valid defense of partial payment is shown. Dibble v. Law, 141 Ga. 364 (80 S. E. 999), and cases there cited; Civil Code (1910), § 3578.

2. For none of the reasons assigned did the court err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.