McCorkel v. First National Bank
McCorkel v. First National Bank
23 Ga. App. 463; 98 S.E. 398; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 157
McCorkel v. First National Bank
Opinion of the Court
1. None of the excerpts from the charge, when considered . in the light of the evidence and the entire ch’arge, are erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.
2. The ground of the motion for a new trial which excepts to the failure of the court‘to give certain specific instructions to the jury is without merit. The charge given covered the particular issue, and if more specific instructions were desired thereon, a proper and timely written request therefor should have been made.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed on the main hill of exceptions; cross-hill dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.