King v. Rodgers
King v. Rodgers
24 Ga. App. 188; 100 S.E. 229; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 490
King v. Rodgers
Opinion of the Court
1. The court did not err in overruling the exceptions of law to the auditor’s report.
2. The court erred in directing a verdict against the defendant upon the 1st, 2d, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th exceptions of facts to the auditor’s report, and in thereafter refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.