Georgia Court of Appeals, 1919

Durham v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 10, 1919 · Bloodworth

24 Ga. App. 266; 100 S.E. 655; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 543

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case contains the usual general grounds only; there is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the ease, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Accusation of riot; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. May 5, 1919.

Harris & Harris, for plaintiff in error. J. F. Kelly, solicitor, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.