James v. Sullivan
James v. Sullivan
24 Ga. App. 297; 100 S.E. 654; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 583
James v. Sullivan
Opinion of the Court
Upon the call of this ease there being no representation for the plaintiff in error, by brief or otherwise, and it being plainly apparent that the writ of error was prosecuted for delay only, the motion of the defendant in error that the record be opened, the
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.