Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Georgia Court of Appeals, 1919

King v. State

King v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 4, 1919 · Broyles
24 Ga. App. 348; 100 S.E. 754; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 640

King v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in connection with the charge as a whole, shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. Under the facts of the ease, the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ.} concur.Indictment for larceny of horse; from Bibb superior court— Judge Mathews. July 17, 1919.John R. Cooper, W. 0. Cooper Jr., for plaintiff in error. John P. Ross, solicitor-general, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑