Georgia Court of Appeals, 1919

Miller v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 4, 1919 · Broyles

24 Ga. App. 354; 101 S.E. 197; 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 652

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

1. In the light of the note of the trial judge, tliex’e is no merit in the 9th special gx-ound of the motion for a new trial.

2. The vei'dict was demanded by the evidence and the statement of the defendant; and therefore, if there were any errors in the charge of the court, they were harmless.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulco and Bloodworth, J.J., concur. Hubert Rawls, Feagin & Hancock, for plaintiff in error. Will Gunn, solicitor, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.