Georgia Court of Appeals, 1920

Cain v. State

Cain v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 11, 1920 · No. 11359 · Broyles
25 Ga. App. 317; 103 S.E. 174; 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 767

Counsel

John T. Coyle, Parker, Gibson & Roddenbery, for plaintiff in error., Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general, contra.

Cain v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

1. The charge upon the law of circumstantial evidence, in the absence of a request for more particular instructions, was sufficiently full. ,

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.