Georgia Court of Appeals, 1920

Rogers v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 14, 1920 · No. 11530 · Broyles

25 Ga. App. 477; 103 S.E. 714; 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 19

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hobbs v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained, only the usual general grounds. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. E. M. Price, Joseph Law, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Ga. App.: 14/598; 16/291; 21/655; 23/144; 23/785.

A. L. Franklin, solicitor-general, John M. Graham, contra,

cited: Ga. App.: 21/493 (1) 21/49 (Cole v. State).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.