Georgia Court of Appeals, 1920

Tate v. State

Tate v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided July 28, 1920 · No. 11663 · Luke
25 Ga. App. 560; 103 S.E. 720; 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 81

Counsel

Colley & Colley, for plaintiff in error., R. C. Norman, solicitor-general, contra.

Tate v. State

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

This ease is here upon the sole assignment of error that the verdict was without evidence to support it. The direct and circumstantial evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict of guilty; the trial judge approved the verdict. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.