Tate v. State
Tate v. State
25 Ga. App. 560; 103 S.E. 720; 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 81
Opinion of the Court
This ease is here upon the sole assignment of error that the verdict was without evidence to support it. The direct and circumstantial evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict of guilty; the trial judge approved the verdict. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.