Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.

Georgia Court of Appeals
Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co., 25 Ga. App. 592 (1920)
103 S.E. 857; 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 93
Bloodworth, Broyles, Luke

Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

Conceding, but not deciding, that tlie petition as amended was subject to one or more of tlie special demurrers interposed, none of the special demurrers were passed upon, and the petition set out a cause of action, though it may have been defectively stated. The court, therefore, erred in dismissing the petition on general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Branch & Howard, Bond Almand, for plaintiff,

cited: Park’s *594Code, §§ 2099, 2101; Tomlinson v. Armour, 74 N. J. L. 780 (65 Atl. 883); Bishop v. Weber, 139 Mass. 411 (1 N. E. 154); Doyle v. Fuerst, 129 La. 838 (56 So. 906, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 480); Ketterer v. Armour, 247 Fed. 921; Pantaze v. West, 7 Ala. App. 599 (61 So. 42); Blood Balm Co. v. Cooper, 83 Ga. 457; Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co., 124 Ga. 121; Martin v. Waycross Coca-Cola Co., 18 Ga. App. 226; Hudgins v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 122 Ga. 695 (distinguished).

Rosser, Slaton, Phillips & Hopkins,

for defendant, cited and distinguished cases cited supra.

Reference

Full Case Name
Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Company
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published