Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Georgia /Cases /Georgia Court of Appeals /

1920

666 Georgia Court of Appeals opinions from 1920.

  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Poole 102 S.E. 461, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Smith v. Savannah Electric Co. 102 S.E. 548, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Cochran v. Meeks 102 S.E. 550, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Truitt v. Rust & Shelburne Sales Co. 102 S.E. 645, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hines v. Wilson 102 S.E. 646, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • City of Sandersville v. Moye 102 S.E. 552, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Armstrong v. Harper 102 S.E. 463, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Alexander v. Easterling 102 S.E. 455, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hughes v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance 102 S.E. 463, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. Thornton 102 S.E. 465, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Carter v. Norton 102 S.E. 648, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Lightfoot v. King 102 S.E. 468, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Rushin v. Massey 102 S.E. 456, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Howard 102 S.E. 456, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Southeastern Mutual Fire Insurance v. Davison 102 S.E. 460, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Bennett v. State 103 S.E. 858, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Grantham 102 S.E. 379, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Dooley v. Wilbanks 102 S.E. 365, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Huggins v. State 103 S.E. 32, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Maxwell Bros. v. Harrison 102 S.E. 372, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Friedman v. Ice Delivery Co. 102 S.E. 380, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • McElveen v. Handshaw 102 S.E. 382, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Jackson v. State 102 S.E. 373, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Russell v. City of Columbus 102 S.E. 381, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Broyles v. State 102 S.E. 381, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Roberson v. State 102 S.E. 378, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Wilson v. Small 102 S.E. 370, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Griffin v. Hines 102 S.E. 380, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Burney 102 S.E. 358, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Scott v. Sanders 102 S.E. 370, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Long v. State 102 S.E. 359, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Marietta Mining Co. v. Armstrong 102 S.E. 451, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hill v. West 102 S.E. 358, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Long v. Hartford Fire Insurance 102 S.E. 379, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Monk v. Jackson 102 S.E. 382, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Headley v. Maxwell Motor Sales Corp. 102 S.E. 374, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Thompson v. Asa G. Candler Inc. 102 S.E. 374, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Independent Order of Puritans v. Cadden 102 S.E. 454, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Kelley v. Ramey 102 S.E. 455, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Thompson v. State 102 S.E. 453, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Newberry v. State 102 S.E. 368, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Davis v. State 102 S.E. 840, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Stanford v. State 102 S.E. 381, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Loyd v. State 102 S.E. 378, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Strickland v. State 35 Ga. App. 206, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Eunice v. Reliance Fertilizer Co. 102 S.E. 371, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Gill v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railway Co. 102 S.E. 457, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Pidcock v. West 102 S.E. 360, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Corbett v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad 102 S.E. 464, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Myers v. Brooks 102 S.E. 369, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
« Prev 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑