Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Georgia /Cases /Georgia Court of Appeals /

1920

666 Georgia Court of Appeals opinions from 1920.

  • Salmon v. Floyd County 102 S.E. 364, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Stephens v. Blackwell 102 S.E. 452, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hodges v. Thompson 102 S.E. 379, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Magnuson v. City of Bainbridge 102 S.E. 459, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • McVay Bros. v. Dodd 102 S.E. 363, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Thrasher v. State 102 S.E. 363, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Bracey v. State 102 S.E. 377, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hart v. Metropolitan Discount Co. 102 S.E. 375, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Citizens Banking Co. v. Jones 102 S.E. 372, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Clay v. State 102 S.E. 367, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Davis v. Town of Gibson 102 S.E. 466, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Maynard v. Wight 102 S.E. 375, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Burlington v. Fields 24 Ga. App. 815, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Strickland v. State 102 S.E. 383, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Ficklen v. Elberton & Eastern Railroad 102 S.E. 376, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Raskin v. State 102 S.E. 375, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Lewis v. State 102 S.E. 367, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Ingram v. State 102 S.E. 452, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Woodall v. State 102 S.E. 913, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Long v. State 102 S.E. 364, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Gardner v. State 102 S.E. 376, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hendrix v. State 102 S.E. 377, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Adams v. State 102 S.E. 372, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hood 102 S.E. 133, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Atlanta Loan & Saving Co. v. Norton 102 S.E. 539, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Brown v. State 102 S.E. 450, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Davis v. State 102 S.E. 378, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Reddick v. State 102 S.E. 132, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Lamb v. Howard 102 S.E. 133, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Fannin County v. Pack 102 S.E. 167, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Ash v. Peoples Bank of Oliver 102 S.E. 134, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Eppes 102 S.E. 174, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Fallin v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Insurance 102 S.E. 177, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Haynes-Henson Shoe Co. v. Brown & Brown 102 S.E. 185, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Pruitt 102 S.E. 182, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co. 102 S.E. 135, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Paulk v. Berrien County 102 S.E. 172, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Moore 102 S.E. 168, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Ellis v. Floyd County 102 S.E. 181, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Standard Coal Co. v. Eclipse Coal Co. 102 S.E. 137, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • McIntosh Land & Timber Co. v. Middleton 102 S.E. 171, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Usry v. Augusta Southern Railroad 102 S.E. 184, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Marietta Ice & Coal Co. v. Western & Atlantic Railroad 102 S.E. 182, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • National Union Fire Insurance v. Macon Hardwood Lumber Co. 102 S.E. 180, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Holbert v. Allred 102 S.E. 192, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Smith v. Fisher 102 S.E. 170, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Planters Gin & Warehouse Co. v. Pitts Banking Co. 102 S.E. 183, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • National Surety Co. v. City of Atlanta 102 S.E. 175, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Commercial Bank of Jasper v. Dasher 102 S.E. 177, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Malsby & Co. v. Widincamp 102 S.E. 178, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
« Prev 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑