Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Georgia /Cases /Georgia Court of Appeals /

1920

666 Georgia Court of Appeals opinions from 1920.

  • Sisson v. Roberts 104 S.E. 910, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Roberson v. Weaver 104 S.E. 912, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • O'Quinn v. Ross 104 S.E. 645, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • American Railway Express Co. v. Bothwell Grocery Co. 104 S.E. 644, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Payne v. Hayes 104 S.E. 917, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Widincamp v. McCall 104 S.E. 642, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Dobbs v. Bell Laundry 105 S.E. 53, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Fruit Dispatch Co. v. Petropol 105 S.E. 48, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Antonopoulas v. Black 104 S.E. 454, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Vandevender v. City of Atlanta 104 S.E. 511, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hall v. Glass 104 S.E. 512, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Skinner v. Hillis 104 S.E. 508, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hines v. Duncan 104 S.E. 519, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Lambert v. Cook 104 S.E. 509, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Thompson 104 S.E. 515, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • McLemore v. Bibb Manufacturing Co. 104 S.E. 516, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Molho v. Johnson 104 S.E. 577, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Wright v. Wright 104 S.E. 456, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hines v. Hendricks 104 S.E. 520, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Newkirk v. Burts & Goodman 104 S.E. 456, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Mullins v. DuVall 104 S.E. 513, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Streetman v. Bussey 104 S.E. 517, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Atlanta Milling Co. v. Acme Manufacturing Co. 104 S.E. 457, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hughes v. Dannenberg Co. 104 S.E. 453, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hurt v. Fort 104 S.E. 509, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Scarsbrook v. Cohen 104 S.E. 512, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Town of Sparks v. Williams 104 S.E. 576, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Paris v. State 104 S.E. 510, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Jordan v. Fowler 104 S.E. 511, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Davis v. Alford 104 S.E. 644, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Delpheon Co. v. Crankshaw 104 S.E. 455, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hampton v. Quitman Manufacturing Co. 104 S.E. 576, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Dunbar v. Hines 104 S.E. 574, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Payne v. Chal-Max Motor Co. 104 S.E. 453, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Von Zonneveld & Philippo v. Shuptrine Co. 104 S.E. 577, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Young Shoe Parlor 104 S.E. 432, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Graham v. State 104 S.E. 249, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • American Railway Express Co. v. Archer 104 S.E. 92, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Tuggle v. Green & Sons 104 S.E. 89, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Callaway v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance 104 S.E. 15, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Voris v. Early County 104 S.E. 89, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Columbus Railroad v. Joyce 104 S.E. 21, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Waddell v. Watkins Medical Co. 104 S.E. 250, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Parcel Delivery Co. v. American Oil Pump & Tank Co. 104 S.E. 27, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Montgomery v. Lester 104 S.E. 28, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Dayhuff v. Brown 104 S.E. 29, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Underwood v. Board of Public Education 104 S.E. 90, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Buchannon v. Park 104 S.E. 20, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Vandiver 104 S.E. 24, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Howard v. Georgia Railroad 104 S.E. 26, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 … 14 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑