Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Georgia /Cases /Georgia Court of Appeals /

1920

746 Georgia Court of Appeals opinions from 1920.

  • Hennon v. Jones 103 S.E. 734, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Ohlen v. McCoy 103 S.E. 803, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co. v. First National Bank 103 S.E. 887, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Griffis v. Buckofzer 103 S.E. 800, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Knight v. Forbes 103 S.E. 725, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Glanton v. State 103 S.E. 884, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Belcher v. State 103 S.E. 852, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Ansley v. Westbrook 103 S.E. 825, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Carhart v. Mackle 103 S.E. 855, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Taylor v. State 103 S.E. 740, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hillyer v. Magruder 103 S.E. 738, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • George B. Curd Co. v. Meigs Lumber & Manufacturing Co. 103 S.E. 740, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Jenkins v. State 103 S.E. 743, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Porter v. Whelchel 26 Ga. App. 39, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Atlanta Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Phosphate Mining Co. 103 S.E. 873, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Bank of Leesburg v. Home Mixture Guano Co. 103 S.E. 693, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Winn 103 S.E. 733, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Mansfield Trading Co. 103 S.E. 804, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Herbner & Son v. Cuero Cotton Oil & Manufacturing Co. 103 S.E. 828, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Alexander v. Forman 103 S.E. 817, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. Warner 103 S.E. 861, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • West v. Thompson 103 S.E. 688, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Flood v. Mayor of Savannah 103 S.E. 720, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Rawleigh Co. v. Collins 103 S.E. 850, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hall v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. 103 S.E. 849, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Laing v. Bodiford 103 S.E. 743, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Savannah River Sales Co. v. Findley 103 S.E. 863, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Stanley v. State 103 S.E. 689, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Lowe v. Slocum 103 S.E. 719, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Steverson v. Bancroft 103 S.E. 840, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Brackett v. State 103 S.E. 728, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Johnson v. State 103 S.E. 718, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Phillips v. Jacobs 103 S.E. 686, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Wolfork v. State 103 S.E. 718, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Stanton v. Parham 103 S.E. 684, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Housley v. Wagner 103 S.E. 880, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. v. Austin 103 S.E. 729, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Rogers v. State 103 S.E. 714, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Wood v. State 103 S.E. 719, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Perry v. State 103 S.E. 719, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Arwood v. State 103 S.E. 726, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Thompson v. State 103 S.E. 731, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Neal v. City of Dublin 103 S.E. 736, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Leatherwood v. State 103 S.E. 685, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Stanford v. State 103 S.E. 728, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Gray v. State 103 S.E. 744, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Lanier v. State 103 S.E. 730, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hogan v. State 35 Ga. App. 594, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Hendricks v. Tyson 103 S.E. 740, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
  • Towns v. State 103 S.E. 724, (Ga. Ct. App. 1920)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 15 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑