Georgia Court of Appeals, 1921

Pittman v. Smith

Pittman v. Smith
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 2, 1921 · Hill
26 Ga. App. 782; 107 S.E. 284; 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 637

Pittman v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.

The undisputed evidence showing that the plaintiff was the bona fide holder, for value and before maturity, of the promissory note sued on, and, the verdict'for attorney’s fees being supported by the evidence, the motion for new trial was properly overruled. No error of law appears.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.