Georgia Court of Appeals, 1921

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 6, 1921 · Luke
27 Ga. App. 419; 108 S.E. 805; 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 939

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

1. The controlling question presented in this record is whether mutual accounts existed between the parties, and it was a question of fact for determination by the jury. See Gunn v. Gunn, 74 Ga. 555 (58 Am. Rep. 447), and cases cited; Hardin v. Stanton, 14 Ga. App. 299 (80 S. E. 698); Civil Code (1910), § 4363.

2. The charge of the court was full and fair. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.