Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Georgia Court of Appeals, 1921

Lusk v. State

Lusk v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 16, 1921 · Bloodworth
27 Ga. App. 593; 110 S.E. 520; 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291

Lusk v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The court properly admitted, the evidence referred to in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial; the evidence amply supported the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, no error of law appearing, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Clay & Blair, for plaintiff in error. John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general pro tem., contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑