Georgia Court of Appeals, 1921

Lusk v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 16, 1921 · Bloodworth

27 Ga. App. 593; 110 S.E. 520; 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Edenfield v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1930)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The court properly admitted, the evidence referred to in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial; the evidence amply supported the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, no error of law appearing, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Clay & Blair, for plaintiff in error. John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general pro tem., contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.