Lusk v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals November 16, 1921

Lusk v. State, 27 Ga. App. 593 (1921)

110 S.E. 520; 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 291

Bloodworth

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The court properly admitted, the evidence referred to in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial; the evidence amply supported the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, no error of law appearing, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Clay & Blair, for plaintiff in error. John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general pro tem., contra.

Reference

Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published