Georgia Court of Appeals, 1921

Grant v. State

Grant v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 17, 1921 · Bloodworth
27 Ga. App. 623; 110 S.E. 415; 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 314

Grant v. State

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence relied upon by the State to connect the accused with the offense of the larceny of a hog is wholly circumstantial, and does not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.Conviction oil larceny of hog; from Wilcox superior court — Judge Gower. July 5, 1921.Hal Lawson, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Grantham, & Kassewitz, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.