Georgia Court of Appeals, 1921

Hammett v. State

Hammett v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided November 17, 1921 · Luke
27 Ga. App. 624; 110 S.E. 624; 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 316
Hammett v. State

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

There is no merit in the errors assigned upon the several excerpts from the charge of the court. If the defendant wished more particular instructions, timely request should have been made. The evidence authorized the conviction, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Harris & Harris, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Taylor, solicitor-general, J. F. Kelly, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.