Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Murray v. Stribling

Murray v. Stribling
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided February 14, 1922 · Bloodworth
28 Ga. App. 211; 110 S.E. 761; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 393

Murray v. Stribling

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

“ The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not having demanded the verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.” Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300). See also Bingham v. Haines, 25 Ga. App. 136 (3) (102 S. E. 923), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. F. A. McWhorter, for plaintiff in error. Homer Legg, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.