Davis v. State
Davis v. State
28 Ga. App. 363; 111 S.E. 221; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 517
Davis v. State
Opinion of the Court
The State depended upon circumstantial evidence to convict the defendant, and the evidence did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. The verdict of guilty was, therefore, unauthorized, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.