Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Hayes v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided April 11, 1922 · Bloodworth

28 Ga. App. 452; 111 S.E. 677; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 592

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, as no error of law appears, this court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Alma — .Judge Tuten. November 26, 1921.

I. J. Bussell, for plaintiff in error. H. L. Causey, solicitor, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.