Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Moore v. Griffith

Moore v. Griffith
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided April 13, 1922 · Bloodworth, Broyles, Luke
28 Ga. App. 482; 111 S.E. 747; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 629

Moore v. Griffith

Opinion of the Court

Luke, J.

The charge of the court was full and fair and adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not err as complained of with respect to the admission and exclusion of testimony, and the evidence amply supported the verdict. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.