Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Moore v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 9, 1922 · Bloodworth, Broyles, Eoneur, Luke

28 Ga. App. 553; 112 S.E. 155; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 679

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the case, shows material error.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.