Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Tutt v. State

Tutt v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided May 9, 1922 · Bloodworth, Broyles, Luke
28 Ga. App. 556; 112 S.E. 290; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 685

Tutt v. State

Opinion of the Court

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

2. While the evidence against the accused was weak, this court cannot say that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence, and, as the finding of the jury has been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.