Arthur v. State
Arthur v. State
28 Ga. App. 576; 112 S.E. 292; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 712
Arthur v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of seduction. In the light of the facts of the ease, and the entire charge of the court, none of the alleged errors in the charge require a new trial. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.