Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Holcombe v. Heard

Holcombe v. Heard
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided June 14, 1922 · Bloodworth
28 Ga. App. 658; 112 S.E. 830; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 760

Holcombe v. Heard

Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, J.

1. The original petition set out a cause of action. The amendment thereto was properly allowed, and the court did not err in overruling the “ oral general demurrer ” to the petition as amended.

*659Decided June 14, 1922.Complaint; from city court of Atlanta — J udge Beid. October 22, 1921.Etheridge, Sams & Etheridge, for plaintiff in error. Dorsey, Brewster, Howell & Heyman, contra.

2. None of the special grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows reversible error.

3. There is ample evidence to support the verdict for $282.89, the amount at which it was allowed to stand after the plaintiff had voluntarily written off $17.11 from $300, the amount for which the jury returned, a verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.