Odom v. State
Odom v. State
28 Ga. App. 728; 113 S.E. 60; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 807
Odom v. State
Opinion of the Court
No error of law is complained of. The evidence is contradictory; the jury, the final arbiters on all questions of fact, believed the witnesses for the State, as they had a right to do, and returned a verdict of guilty, and this court cannot overturn such a verdict when approved by the judge who presided at the trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.