Yeates v. State
Yeates v. State
29 Ga. App. 24; 113 S.E. 111; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 24
Yeates v. State
Opinion of the Court
The conviction of the defendant depending entirely upon circumstantial evidence, and that evidence not being sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt, his conviction was unauthorized, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.