The evidence in this case being substantially the same as that in Hight Accessory Place v. Lam, 26 Ga. App. 163 (105 S. E. 872), which was a suit by another party against the same defendant growing out of the same transaction, and this court having held that the evidence in that case was sufficient to authorize a verdict for the plaintiff, the court erred in the instant case in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment reversed.