Georgia Court of Appeals, 1922

Bray v. Porterfield & Brown

Bray v. Porterfield & Brown
Georgia Court of Appeals · Decided October 3, 1922 · Bloodwokth
29 Ga. App. 135; 114 S.E. 86; 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 110

Bray v. Porterfield & Brown

Opinion of the Court

Bloodwokth, J.

As the motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds, the only question for determination by this court is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, and a verdict supported by any evidence and approved by the trial judge cannot be set aside by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82 (105 S. E. 377).

Judgment affirmed.

.Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.